Re: [PATCH][docs] Re: Update __atomic builtins documentation.

2015-05-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/30/2015 04:44 AM, Matthew Wahab wrote: [added tags to subject] Ping. On 20/04/15 14:29, Matthew Wahab wrote: Hello, The documentation for the __atomic builtins isn't clear about their expectations and behaviour. In particular, assumptions about the C11/C++11 restrictions on programs sho

[PATCH][docs] Re: Update __atomic builtins documentation.

2015-04-30 Thread Matthew Wahab
[added tags to subject] Ping. On 20/04/15 14:29, Matthew Wahab wrote: Hello, The documentation for the __atomic builtins isn't clear about their expectations and behaviour. In particular, assumptions about the C11/C++11 restrictions on programs should be stated and the different behaviour of m

Update __atomic builtins documentation.

2015-04-20 Thread Matthew Wahab
Hello, The documentation for the __atomic builtins isn't clear about their expectations and behaviour. In particular, assumptions about the C11/C++11 restrictions on programs should be stated and the different behaviour of memory models in fences and in operations should be noted. The behaviour o