On Tue, 10 May 2022 17:01:26 PDT (-0700), Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
[Sorry for cross-posting to a bunch of lists, I figured it'd be best to
have all the discussions in one thread.]
We currently only support what is defined by official RISC-V
specifications in the various GNU toolchain projects. The
A generous [snip], as this has been getting a bit long.
On Sun, 15 May 2022 at 03:21, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> I am worried about bad
> actors leveraging any policy to make a bunch of noise, as that's a
> pretty persistent problem in RISC-V land and it looks like things are
> going to get worse b
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 3:38 AM Philipp Tomsich
wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 12:00, Christoph Müllner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 2:02 AM Palmer Dabbelt
> wrote:
> > >
> > > [Sorry for cross-posting to a bunch of lists, I figured it'd be best to
> > > have all the discussions in
On Fri, 13 May 2022 03:37:22 PDT (-0700), philipp.toms...@vrull.eu wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 12:00, Christoph Müllner wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 2:02 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> [Sorry for cross-posting to a bunch of lists, I figured it'd be best to
> have all the discussions in one
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:58 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Christoph Müllner via Binutils:
>
> > I'd like to add two points to this topic and raise two questions.
> >
> > 1) Accepting vendor extensions = avoidance of fragmentation
> >
> > RISC-V implementors are actively encouraged to implement
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 12:58, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Christoph Müllner via Binutils:
>
> > I'd like to add two points to this topic and raise two questions.
> >
> > 1) Accepting vendor extensions = avoidance of fragmentation
> >
> > RISC-V implementors are actively encouraged to implement the
* Christoph Müllner via Binutils:
> I'd like to add two points to this topic and raise two questions.
>
> 1) Accepting vendor extensions = avoidance of fragmentation
>
> RISC-V implementors are actively encouraged to implement their
> own ISA extensions. To avoid fragmentation in the SW ecosystem
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 12:00, Christoph Müllner wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 2:02 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >
> > [Sorry for cross-posting to a bunch of lists, I figured it'd be best to
> > have all the discussions in one thread.]
> >
> > We currently only support what is defined by offici
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 2:02 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> [Sorry for cross-posting to a bunch of lists, I figured it'd be best to
> have all the discussions in one thread.]
>
> We currently only support what is defined by official RISC-V
> specifications in the various GNU toolchain projects. The
[Sorry for cross-posting to a bunch of lists, I figured it'd be best to
have all the discussions in one thread.]
We currently only support what is defined by official RISC-V
specifications in the various GNU toolchain projects. There's certainly
some grey areas there, but in general that mean
10 matches
Mail list logo
