Richard Biener writes:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Previously VECTOR_CST_NELTS (t) read the number of elements from
>> TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (TREE_TYPE (t)). There were two ways of handling
>> this with variable TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS: either forcibly convert th
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Previously VECTOR_CST_NELTS (t) read the number of elements from
> TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (TREE_TYPE (t)). There were two ways of handling
> this with variable TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS: either forcibly convert the
> number to a constant (which
Previously VECTOR_CST_NELTS (t) read the number of elements from
TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (TREE_TYPE (t)). There were two ways of handling
this with variable TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS: either forcibly convert the
number to a constant (which is doable) or store the number directly
in the VECTOR_CST. The la
