Re: Ping: Some remodelling of the ARM vld and vst patterns

2011-04-12 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Richard, > gcc/ >* config/arm/arm.c (arm_print_operand): Use MEM_SIZE to get the >size of a '%A' memory reference. >(T_DREG, T_QREG): New neon_builtin_type_bits. >(arm_init_neon_builtins): Assert that the load and store operands >are neon_struct_operands. >(locate_neon_

Ping: Some remodelling of the ARM vld and vst patterns

2011-04-12 Thread Richard Sandiford
Ping for this change to the NEON vldN and vstN patterns: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01996.html Thanks, Richard

Re: Some remodelling of the ARM vld and vst patterns

2011-03-30 Thread Richard Sandiford
Richard Sandiford writes: > The ??? is saying that the V8QI-derived MEM is really a 3-byte access, > not a 4-byte (SI) access, and so on. The comment makes the mode sound > like a representational niceity, but really, there's no such thing as > a "conservatively wrong" memory size here.

Some remodelling of the ARM vld and vst patterns

2011-03-29 Thread Richard Sandiford
The patterns for the Neon vld and vst intrinsics use the following sort of construct to refer to memory: (mem:FOO (match_operand:SI X "register_operand" "r")) This patch changes them to use: (match_operand:FOO' X "neon_struct_operand" "(=)Um") instead. This has some performance benefit