On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> expmed.c:lshift_value has:
>
> val = double_int::from_uhwi (INTVAL (value)).zext (bitsize);
> val = val.llshift (bitpos, HOST_BITS_PER_DOUBLE_INT);
>
> but its only caller has already zero-extended INTVAL (value) from BITSIZE,
> so we
expmed.c:lshift_value has:
val = double_int::from_uhwi (INTVAL (value)).zext (bitsize);
val = val.llshift (bitpos, HOST_BITS_PER_DOUBLE_INT);
but its only caller has already zero-extended INTVAL (value) from BITSIZE,
so we might as well pass that instead of the (value, bitsize) pair.
This is
