Hi Richard,
On 14/10/16 23:53, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:12 AM, kugan
wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 13/10/16 20:44, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:49 AM, kugan
wrote:
Hi Richard,
what does this try to do? Preserve info VRP computed across PTA?
I think
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:12 AM, kugan
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
> On 13/10/16 20:44, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:49 AM, kugan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
what does this try to do? Preserve info VRP computed across PTA?
I think we didn't yet sor
Hi Richard,
On 13/10/16 20:44, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:49 AM, kugan
wrote:
Hi Richard,
what does this try to do? Preserve info VRP computed across PTA?
I think we didn't yet sort out the nonlocal/escaped vs. null handling
properly
(or how PTA should handle get_ptr_
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:49 AM, kugan
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>>
>> what does this try to do? Preserve info VRP computed across PTA?
>>
>> I think we didn't yet sort out the nonlocal/escaped vs. null handling
>> properly
>> (or how PTA should handle get_ptr_nonnull). The way you are using it
>>
Hi Richard,
what does this try to do? Preserve info VRP computed across PTA?
I think we didn't yet sort out the nonlocal/escaped vs. null handling properly
(or how PTA should handle get_ptr_nonnull). The way you are using it
asks for pt.null to be orthogonal to nonlocal/escaped and thus havi
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:46 AM, kugan
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
>
> On 07/10/16 21:03, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:53 AM, kugan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/08/16 18:58, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9,
Hi Richard,
On 07/10/16 21:03, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:53 AM, kugan wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 09/08/16 18:58, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, kugan
wrote:
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for the review.
On 08/08/16 16:40, Jakub Jelin
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:53 AM, kugan wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
>
> On 09/08/16 18:58, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, kugan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jakub,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review.
>>>
>>> On 08/08/16 16:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 09/08/16 18:58, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, kugan
wrote:
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for the review.
On 08/08/16 16:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 01:36:51PM +1000, kugan wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssanames.h b/gc
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, kugan
wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 08/08/16 16:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 01:36:51PM +1000, kugan wrote:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssanames.h b/gcc/tree-ssanames.h
>>> index c81b1a1..6e34433 100644
>>> --- a/g
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for the review.
On 08/08/16 16:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 01:36:51PM +1000, kugan wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssanames.h b/gcc/tree-ssanames.h
index c81b1a1..6e34433 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssanames.h
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssanames.h
@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ struct GTY(
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 01:36:51PM +1000, kugan wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssanames.h b/gcc/tree-ssanames.h
> index c81b1a1..6e34433 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssanames.h
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssanames.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ struct GTY(()) ptr_info_def
> above alignment. Access only through the s
Hi,
This patch tries to add nonnull_p attribute to ptr_info_def. As it
stands, range_info_def is bigger in size than ptr_info_def. Therefore
adding nonnull_p should not change the size.
I am setting this based on the VRP analysis. Right there is no uses for
this. But the idea is, this can b
13 matches
Mail list logo
