On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> So yes, handling BIT_FIELD_REF in the vectorizer looks like the correct
>> way to do - but mind that you should constrain the BIT_FIELD_REFs you
>> allow (I suppose in the end that's properly done
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
>
>> * tree-flow-inline.h (get_addr_base_and_unit_offset_1): Handle
>> BIT_FIELD_REF.
>
>
> I wrote a safer version of this for PR52436:
That variant is ok - please test and commit separat
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
* tree-flow-inline.h (get_addr_base_and_unit_offset_1): Handle
BIT_FIELD_REF.
I wrote a safer version of this for PR52436:
case BIT_FIELD_REF:
- return NULL_TREE;
+ {
+ HOST_WIDE_INT this_off = TREE_INT
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
So yes, handling BIT_FIELD_REF in the vectorizer looks like the correct
way to do - but mind that you should constrain the BIT_FIELD_REFs you
allow (I suppose in the end that's properly done by other part of the analysis).
Does that mean adding someth
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> this message is to check that I am not doing something absurd and ask for
>>> a
>>> bit of advice.
>>>
>>> In the attach
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this message is to check that I am not doing something absurd and ask for a
bit of advice.
In the attached patch, I let SLP recognize vector loads/stores just like it
recognizes those in an
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this message is to check that I am not doing something absurd and ask for a
> bit of advice.
>
> In the attached patch, I let SLP recognize vector loads/stores just like it
> recognizes those in an array. It has a few issues: the cos
Hello,
this message is to check that I am not doing something absurd and ask for
a bit of advice.
In the attached patch, I let SLP recognize vector loads/stores just like
it recognizes those in an array. It has a few issues: the cost of the
vectorized version is overestimated, the base objec
