> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:16:48 +0200
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
>
> PR47836
> PR23656
> PR47733
> PR49247
> * configure.ac (target_libraries): Remove target-libiberty.
...
JFTR, that's not proper PR annotation. I changed it as obvious
to the following, which en
> Ok for trunk?
Ok with me. I'll let the branch maintainers decide if they want it
for their branches.
> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:58:41 + (UTC)
> From: "Joseph S. Myers"
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> > It seems none in approval capacity have any objection to
> > (figuratively) s/target-libiberty//g in toplevel/configure.ac on
> > all branches. Is an --enable-target-li
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> It seems none in approval capacity have any objection to
> (figuratively) s/target-libiberty//g in toplevel/configure.ac on
> all branches. Is an --enable-target-libiberty or
> --with-target-libiberty needed? (I'd just rather not.)
There should b
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2011, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > At this point, though, I'm tempted to say "there's no such thing as a
> > target libiberty" and rip all the target-libiberty rules out, and let
>
> Yes please. I've been arguing for that for some time.
>
> h
