> This looks OK to me.
I obviously didn't look carefully enough, there are a few thinkos in the
output_constructor_bitfield hunk:
- if (shift < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
- && shift + this_time > HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
- {
- this_time = shift + this_time -
> Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port
> and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through
> the entire patch.This patch covers the half of the rtl code.
This looks OK to me.
--
Eric Botcazou
