On January 8, 2016 4:13:17 PM GMT+01:00, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On 01/08/16 05:39, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> >Oh, and I _do_ belive that ultimatively we should have all constant
>pool
>> >entries (and CONST_DECLs) in the varpool.
>>
>> FWIW that certainly seems like the right goal.
>Indeed it i
> On 01/08/16 05:39, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> >Oh, and I _do_ belive that ultimatively we should have all constant pool
> >entries (and CONST_DECLs) in the varpool.
>
> FWIW that certainly seems like the right goal.
Indeed it is on my TODO. I need to make CONST_DECLs to have visibility (so they
On 01/08/16 05:39, Richard Biener wrote:
Oh, and I _do_ belive that ultimatively we should have all constant pool
entries (and CONST_DECLs) in the varpool.
FWIW that certainly seems like the right goal.
nathan
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/04/2016 08:57 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>
>> My patch to stop constant pool objects accidentally ending up in the
>> varpool caused problems with (at least) powerpc.
>> (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02100.html) Hence reverte
On 01/04/2016 08:57 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
My patch to stop constant pool objects accidentally ending up in the
varpool caused problems with (at least) powerpc.
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02100.html) Hence reverted.
This patch changes compare_base_decls to simply use the v
My patch to stop constant pool objects accidentally ending up in the varpool
caused problems with (at least) powerpc.
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02100.html) Hence reverted.
This patch changes compare_base_decls to simply use the varpool getter, rather
than get_create. We s
On 12/23/15 09:48, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 12/21/15 14:45, Jeff Law wrote:
With some kind of comment in decl_in_symtab_p indicating why we need to check
and filter on !DECL_IN_CONSTANT_POOL this is OK.
Done, thanks. (I half guessed HPPA might be such a port :)
sigh, there are other route
On 12/21/15 14:45, Jeff Law wrote:
With some kind of comment in decl_in_symtab_p indicating why we need to check
and filter on !DECL_IN_CONSTANT_POOL this is OK.
Done, thanks. (I half guessed HPPA might be such a port :)
nathan
2015-12-23 Nathan Sidwell
gcc/
* alias.c (compare_base_de
On 12/19/2015 09:47 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Either build_constant_desc (varasm.c) should put constants into the
varpool or decl_in_symtab_p should ignore constant pool VAR_DECLS. It
appears to me that the latter is the right choice, as constant pool
entries can't be related to regular varpool
