On Dec 31, 2013, at 11:46 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:39:58PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
>> In testing for wide-int, we discovered that someone seems to have blown
>> pch
> Thanks for tracking this down, this sounds like PR59436.
To confirm that, one would need to either,
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 08:46:31AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Thanks for tracking this down, this sounds like PR59436. How have you
> managed to track it down? I also wonder why it doesn't seem to affect 4.8
> when it also has the same change.
>
> Based on the comments in gengtype.c, I'd expe
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:39:58PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> In testing for wide-int, we discovered that someone seems to have blown
> pch. The problem is that the optabs field is not a string. It's size is
> not determined by strlen. strlen are the semantics gty attaches to
> unsigned char * d
