On 09/25/2015 12:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/24/2015 02:41 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The following patch solves the 2nd case of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
I did a lot of benchmarking of different heuristics in hard reg cost
propagation in IRA. This is the best
On 09/24/2015 02:41 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The following patch solves the 2nd case of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
I did a lot of benchmarking of different heuristics in hard reg cost
propagation in IRA. This is the best what I found. The patch improves
stably
On 09/24/2015 02:41 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The following patch solves the 2nd case of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
I did a lot of benchmarking of different heuristics in hard reg cost
propagation in IRA. This is the best what I found. The patch improves
stably
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:39:19PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> The following patch is for
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
>
> The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86 and x86-64.
>
> Committed as rev. 227382.
>
> 2015-09-01 Vladimir Makarov
>
>
On 3 September 2015 at 20:28, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 09/03/2015 11:00 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>>
>> On 09/02/2015 11:32 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1 September 2015 at 21:39, Vladimir Makarov
>>> wrote:
The following patch is for
On 09/03/2015 11:00 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 09/02/2015 11:32 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
On 1 September 2015 at 21:39, Vladimir Makarov
wrote:
The following patch is for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x
On 09/02/2015 11:32 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
On 1 September 2015 at 21:39, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The following patch is for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86 and x86-64.
Committed as rev. 227382.
Sin
Hi Vladimir,
On 1 September 2015 at 21:39, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> The following patch is for
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
>
> The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86 and x86-64.
>
> Committed as rev. 227382.
>
Since this patch, I can see:
gcc.dg/vect/s