Richard Biener writes:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
natch.pd tries to reassociate two bit operations if both of them have
constant operands. However, with the
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> natch.pd tries to reassociate two bit operations if both of them have
>>> constant operands. However, with the polynomial integers added later,
Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> natch.pd tries to reassociate two bit operations if both of them have
>> constant operands. However, with the polynomial integers added later,
>> there's no guarantee that a bit operation on two integers can
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> natch.pd tries to reassociate two bit operations if both of them have
> constant operands. However, with the polynomial integers added later,
> there's no guarantee that a bit operation on two integers can be folded
> at compile time. T
