On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Michael Haubenwallner
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 02/10/2016 10:52 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>
>>> There are two remaining issues:
>>>
>>> 1) FDEs with overlapping ranges causing problems with exceptions. I'm
>>> not sure of the best way to work around this.
Hi David,
On 02/10/2016 10:52 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>> There are two remaining issues:
>>
>> 1) FDEs with overlapping ranges causing problems with exceptions. I'm
>> not sure of the best way to work around this. Your patch is one
>> possible solution.
>
> This patch is not meant as
On 02/10/2016 02:27 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Michael Haubenwallner
> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/08/2016 02:59 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> Runtime linking is disabled by default on AIX, and I disabled it for
>>> libstdc++.
>>
>> For large applications mainly develope
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Michael Haubenwallner
wrote:
>
> On 02/08/2016 02:59 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Runtime linking is disabled by default on AIX, and I disabled it for
>> libstdc++.
>
> For large applications mainly developed on/for Linux I do prefer/need
> runtime linking even on
On 02/08/2016 02:59 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Runtime linking is disabled by default on AIX, and I disabled it for
> libstdc++.
For large applications mainly developed on/for Linux I do prefer/need
runtime linking even on AIX. Still I do believe there is no AIX-based
reason to leave runtime li
Runtime linking is disabled by default on AIX, and I disabled it for libstdc++.
There are two remaining issues:
1) FDEs with overlapping ranges causing problems with exceptions. I'm
not sure of the best way to work around this. Your patch is one
possible solution.
2) AIX linker garbage collect
