On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 20:43 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2020, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>
> > ISTM the corresponding documentation hunk for sourcebuild.texi is missing.
>
> Thanks, I wasn't aware that testsuite effective targets were documented
> there.
>
> Here's the miss
On Apr 28, 2020, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> ISTM the corresponding documentation hunk for sourcebuild.texi is missing.
Thanks, I wasn't aware that testsuite effective targets were documented
there.
Here's the missing documentation. Tested with 'make info' on
x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok to in
On 24 April 2020 11:59:50 CEST, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>On Apr 23, 2020, Martin Sebor wrote:
>
>> Sure. I'd go with _fileio but that's just a suggestion.
>
>Okiedokie, here's the patch using fileio instead of tmpnam for the
>effective target name. I'm going to check it in shortly.
>
>
>introduc
On Apr 23, 2020, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Sure. I'd go with _fileio but that's just a suggestion.
Okiedokie, here's the patch using fileio instead of tmpnam for the
effective target name. I'm going to check it in shortly.
introduce target fileio and require it in tests that use tmpnam
Some tar
On 4/23/20 2:21 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 21, 2020, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 17 April 2020 21:21:41 CEST, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 4/17/20 11:48 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 9, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Some target C libraries that aren't recogniz
On Apr 21, 2020, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On 17 April 2020 21:21:41 CEST, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> On 4/17/20 11:48 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> On Apr 9, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>>
Some target C libraries that aren't recognized as freestanding don't
On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 14:48 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> > Some target C libraries that aren't recognized as freestanding don't
> > have filesystem support, so calling tmpnam, fopen/open and
> > remove/unlink fails to link.
> > This patch introduces
On 4/22/20 2:03 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 16:59, Martin Sebor wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/543672.html
I'm okay with the changes to the tests.
The target-supports.exp changes look reasonable to me as well but
I can't approve th
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 16:59, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/543672.html
> >>
> >> I'm okay with the changes to the tests.
> >>
> >> The target-supports.exp changes look reasonable to me as well but
> >> I can't approve them. Since you said it's fo
On 4/21/20 3:50 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 17 April 2020 21:21:41 CEST, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 4/17/20 11:48 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 9, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Some target C libraries that aren't recognized as freestanding don't
have filesystem s
On 17 April 2020 21:21:41 CEST, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>On 4/17/20 11:48 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Apr 9, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>>> Some target C libraries that aren't recognized as freestanding don't
>>> have filesystem support, so calling tmpnam, fopen/open and
On 4/17/20 11:48 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 9, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Some target C libraries that aren't recognized as freestanding don't
have filesystem support, so calling tmpnam, fopen/open and
remove/unlink fails to link.
This patch introduces a tmpnam effective target to
On Apr 9, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Some target C libraries that aren't recognized as freestanding don't
> have filesystem support, so calling tmpnam, fopen/open and
> remove/unlink fails to link.
> This patch introduces a tmpnam effective target to the testsuite, and
> requires it in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
