On 05/19/16 14:42, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
+ "operands[2] = make_safe_from (operands[2], operands[0]);"
Please use { ... } rather than "" for readability. Ok with that change.
nathan
On 05/18/16 23:42, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
+(define_expand "sincossf3"
+ [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "nvptx_register_operand" "=R")
+(unspec:SF [(match_operand:SF 2 "nvptx_register_operand" "R")]
+ UNSPEC_COS))
+ (set (match_operand:SF 1 "nvptx_register_operand" "=R")
+(u
On 05/19/2016 04:29 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2016, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> Note that the documentation suggests using 'make_safe_from' to concisely
> express conflict resolution:
>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md
>> index 33a4862..69bb
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> >> +(define_expand "sincossf3"
> >> + [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "nvptx_register_operand" "=R")
> >> +(unspec:SF [(match_operand:SF 2 "nvptx_register_operand" "R")]
> >> + UNSPEC_COS))
> >> + (set (match_operand:SF 1 "nvptx_registe
On 05/18/2016 05:29 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 05/17/16 17:30, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> On 05/17/2016 02:22 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
gcc.sum
Tests that now fail, but worked before:
nvptx-none-run: gcc.c-torture/execute/20100316-1.c -Os execution
test
nvptx-n
On 05/17/16 17:30, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
On 05/17/2016 02:22 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Good eyes, thanks! I thought I had to create a new insn, but I got away
with an expand. I attached the updated patch.
Cesar
gcc.sum
Tests that now fail, but worked before:
nvptx-none-run: gcc.c-tortur
On 05/17/2016 02:22 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
>> On 05/13/2016 01:13 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On May 13, 2016 9:18:57 PM GMT+02:00, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
>>>
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> On 05/13/2016 01:13 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On May 13, 2016 9:18:57 PM GMT+02:00, Cesar Philippidis
>>> wrote:
The cse_sincos pass tries to optimize sequences such
On 05/13/2016 01:13 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On May 13, 2016 9:18:57 PM GMT+02:00, Cesar Philippidis
>> wrote:
>>> The cse_sincos pass tries to optimize sequences such as
>>>
>>> sin (x);
>>> cos (x);
>>>
>>> into a single call to
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On May 13, 2016 9:18:57 PM GMT+02:00, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
>>The cse_sincos pass tries to optimize sequences such as
>>
>> sin (x);
>> cos (x);
>>
>>into a single call to sincos, or cexpi, when available. However, the
>>nvptx targ
On May 13, 2016 9:18:57 PM GMT+02:00, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
>The cse_sincos pass tries to optimize sequences such as
>
> sin (x);
> cos (x);
>
>into a single call to sincos, or cexpi, when available. However, the
>nvptx target has sin and cos instructions, albeit with some loss of
>precision
11 matches
Mail list logo
