On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 09/24/2013 05:50 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>>
Did you forget to attach the patch?
>>> Of course not! :-P
>>>
>>> Oh how I hate mondays.
>>
>> Old patch attached?
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>
> Errr. no. that last one has gimple
On 09/24/2013 05:50 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Did you forget to attach the patch?
Of course not! :-P
Oh how I hate mondays.
Old patch attached?
Richard.
Errr. no. that last one has gimple-builder.[ch] and the
ssa_replace_lhs renamed to gimple_replace_ssa_lhs..
I'll also wait for
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 01:05 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 12:21 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/20/2013 04:08 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
>
>>
On 09/23/2013 01:05 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 12:21 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 09/20/2013 04:08 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 09/19/2013 09:24 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I think this is of most use to ssa passes t
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 12:21 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 09/20/2013 04:08 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >> On 09/19/2013 09:24 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think this is of most use to ssa passes that need to construct code
>
On 09/20/2013 04:08 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 09/19/2013 09:24 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I think this is of most use to ssa passes that need to construct code
snippets, so I propose we make this ssa specific and put it in tree-ssa.c
(r
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>> On 09/19/2013 09:24 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I think this is of most use to ssa passes that need to const
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>> On 09/19/2013 09:24 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I think this is of most use to ssa passes that need to construct code
>>> snippets, so I propose we make this ssa specific a
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> I see the benefit in the streamlined asan.c code, but I detest that
> ssa_mode flag. And as long as it supports SSA, I don't think it should be
> in gimple.c.
Yeah, at the time that I introduced it, I had a hard time with the
normal/ssa
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:08:20AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Can you move the builders to asan.c please? From a quick glance it seems
> to have various issues so it shouldn't be used (I wonder who approved them
> in the end ... maybe it was even me).
Moving them to asan.c looks wrong. If we
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 09/19/2013 09:24 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think this is of most use to ssa passes that need to construct code
>> snippets, so I propose we make this ssa specific and put it in tree-ssa.c
>> (renaming it ssa_build_assign), *OR
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> I'm looking at pulling ssa specific bits out of gimple.c so that it doesn't
> require the ssa headers, and can concentrate on basic gimple support. I
> stumbled across the "new" build interface in gimple.c consisting of these
> routines:
>
On 09/19/2013 09:24 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I think this is of most use to ssa passes that need to construct code
snippets, so I propose we make this ssa specific and put it in
tree-ssa.c (renaming it ssa_build_assign), *OR* we could leave it
general purpose and put it in its own set of fi
13 matches
Mail list logo
