Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> $ git ls-files .|xargs perl -0777 -n -e 'while (/\b(it)\s+\1\b/gms)'
>> -e '{$n=($` =~ tr/\n/\n/ + 1); ($v=$&)=~s/\n/\\n/g; print
>> "$ARGV:$n:$v\n"}'|grep -v ChangeLog
>> gcc/config/cris/cris.opt:152:it it
>> gcc/gensupport.c:
On Apr 10, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> $ git ls-files .|xargs perl -0777 -n -e 'while (/\b(it)\s+\1\b/gms)' -e
> '{$n=($` =~ tr/\n/\n/ + 1); ($v=$&)=~s/\n/\\n/g; print "$ARGV:$n:$v\n"}'|grep
> -v ChangeLog
> gcc/config/cris/cris.opt:152:it it
> gcc/gensupport.c:1066:it\n it
These
Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I've noticed/fixed a few occurrences of doubled words like "the the",
>> "to to"
>
> I fixed all the non-surious matches in the gcc/testsuite. if if in
> the fortran testsuite was the major spurious match. Thanks.
Thanks.
Ye
Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I've noticed/fixed a few occurrences of doubled words like "the the",
>
> I've fixed the obviously wrong ones in gcc/.* excluding ada and go. I
> don't hate Ada and go, since I don't pretend to keep up on rules to
> their part
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Jim Meyering wrote:
> boehm-gc/configure.host:5:the the
> boehm-gc/doc/README:123:to to
> boehm-gc/misc.c:212:to to
> boehm-gc/os_dep.c:4010:to to
Maintained externally and the GCC copy is very out-of-date. Send patches
to upstream boehm-gc instead.
> libdecnumber/decCommo
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I would be inclined to prepare a patch if I thought it would
> be applied (promptly?), but I submitted a clear/simple fix for
> an obvious double-free bug (albeit only in a test case) a month ago:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/85973/
>
On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've noticed/fixed a few occurrences of doubled words like "the the",
I've fixed the obviously wrong ones in gcc/.* excluding ada and go. I don't
hate Ada and go, since I don't pretend to keep up on rules to their parts of
the tree. I did do j
On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I would be inclined to prepare a patch if I thought it would
> be applied (promptly?), but I submitted a clear/simple fix for
> an obvious double-free bug (albeit only in a test case) a month ago:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/85973/
On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've noticed/fixed a few occurrences of doubled words like "the the",
> "to to"
I fixed all the non-surious matches in the gcc/testsuite. if if in the fortran
testsuite was the major spurious match. Thanks.
Index: gcc.target/mips/inter/mips16_
