On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Do you have a copyright assignment on file?
Yes.
--
Marc Glisse
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is take 2 on this patch, which seems cleaner. Bootstrapped and
>>> regression tested.
>>>
>>> gcc/ChangeLog
>>>
>>> 2012-04-25
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Here is take 2 on this patch, which seems cleaner. Bootstrapped and
regression tested.
gcc/ChangeLog
2012-04-25 Marc Glisse
PR middle-end/27139
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (combine_co
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Marc Glisse
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> a conversion like int->double->int is just the identity, as long as
>>> double
>>> is big enough to represent all
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
a conversion like int->double->int is just the identity, as long as double
is big enough to represent all ints exactly. The most natural way I found to
do this optimization is the attached
First, thanks a lot for answering.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
a conversion like int->double->int is just the identity, as long as double
is big enough to represent all ints exactly. The most natural way I found to
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a conversion like int->double->int is just the identity, as long as double
> is big enough to represent all ints exactly. The most natural way I found to
> do this optimization is the attached:
>
> 2012-04-25 Marc Glisse
>
>
