On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> Please do the early outs where you compute the arguments. Thus, right
>> after getting op0 in this case or right after computing n for the n != 1
>> check.
>>
>> I think you need to verify that
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Please do the early outs where you compute the arguments. Thus, right
after getting op0 in this case or right after computing n for the n != 1 check.
I think you need to verify that the type of 'op' is actually the element type
of op0. The BIT_FIELD
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> + if (code == VEC_PERM_EXPR)
> +{
> + tree p, m, index, tem;
> + unsigned nelts;
> + m = gimple_assign_rhs3 (def_stmt);
> + if (TREE_CODE (m) != VEC
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
+ if (code == VEC_PERM_EXPR)
+{
+ tree p, m, index, tem;
+ unsigned nelts;
+ m = gimple_assign_rhs3 (def_stmt);
+ if (TREE_CODE (m) != VECTOR_CST)
+ return false;
+ nelts = VECTOR_CST_NELTS (m);
+ idx = TREE_INT
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> Please do the early outs where you compute the arguments. Thus, right
>> after getting op0 in this case or right after computing n for the n != 1
>> check.
>
>
> Ok.
>
>> I think you need to veri
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Please do the early outs where you compute the arguments. Thus, right
after getting op0 in this case or right after computing n for the n != 1
check.
Ok.
I think you need to verify that the type of 'op' is actually the element type
of op0. The B
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this patch makes it so that instead of taking the k-th element of a shuffle
> of V, we directly take the k'-th element of V.
>
> Note that I am *not* checking that the shuffle is only used once. There can
> be some circumstances where
