Michael Matz wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>
>> (Why we, in the age of non-sucky version control, persist in keeping
>> manual changelog files is beyond me..)
>
> The one single reason why I'm very happy about our ChangeLog file policy
> is that I can grep it easily. Listing
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> (Why we, in the age of non-sucky version control, persist in keeping
> manual changelog files is beyond me..)
The one single reason why I'm very happy about our ChangeLog file policy
is that I can grep it easily. Listing the changelog of the w
Tom Tromey wrote:
>> "Jim" == Jim Meyering writes:
>
> Jim> Since v3, I've rebased these and moved the fortran changes to precede
> Jim> these (changing gfc_free to free introduced a few more instances
> Jim> that this transformation deals with). As mentioned before, the
> Jim> conditional-re
> "Jim" == Jim Meyering writes:
Jim> Since v3, I've rebased these and moved the fortran changes to precede
Jim> these (changing gfc_free to free introduced a few more instances
Jim> that this transformation deals with). As mentioned before, the
Jim> conditional-removing transformation was do
Since v3, I've rebased these and moved the fortran changes to precede
these (changing gfc_free to free introduced a few more instances
that this transformation deals with). As mentioned before, the
conditional-removing transformation was done mechanically with
two manual corrections. One to deal
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 18:08, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I've rebased and divided/reordered these changes as you suggested.
>> Here are the fortran parts. I'll post the other parts separately.
>> Parts 1 and 3 are manual. Part 2 is the big mechanical change with
>> two man
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 18:08, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've rebased and divided/reordered these changes as you suggested.
> Here are the fortran parts. I'll post the other parts separately.
> Parts 1 and 3 are manual. Part 2 is the big mechanical change with
> two manual adjustments:
>
> [PATCH 1
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:51, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 19:53, Jim Meyering wrote:
Relative to v2, I've added libgo/ to the list of exempt directories and
added
this recently discussed gfc_free patch, at the
> I added Jim to the gcc group.
Thanks, Tom.
> "Janne" == Janne Blomqvist writes:
Jim> Can someone add me to the gcc group? That would help.
Jim> I already have ssh access to sourceware.org.
Janne> I'm not sure if I'm considered to be well-established
Janne> enough, so could someone help Jim out here, please?
I added Jim to the gcc g
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:54, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:51, Jim Meyering wrote:
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 19:53, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Relative to v2, I've added libgo/ to the list
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:54, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:51, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Janne Blomqvist wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 19:53, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Relative to v2, I've added libgo/ to the list of exempt directories and
>>>
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:51, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 19:53, Jim Meyering wrote:
Relative to v2, I've added libgo/ to the list of exempt directories and
added
this recently discussed gfc_free patch, at the
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:51, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 19:53, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Relative to v2, I've added libgo/ to the list of exempt directories and
>>> added
>>> this recently discussed gfc_free patch, at the request of Tobias Burnus.
>>>
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 19:53, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Relative to v2, I've added libgo/ to the list of exempt directories and added
>> this recently discussed gfc_free patch, at the request of Tobias Burnus.
>> Also, I corrected an error in fortran's ChangeLog and removed a
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 19:53, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Relative to v2, I've added libgo/ to the list of exempt directories and added
> this recently discussed gfc_free patch, at the request of Tobias Burnus.
> Also, I corrected an error in fortran's ChangeLog and removed all
> whitespace changes from
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/05/11 07:05, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Someone asked me about this yesterday, and since I've been carrying
>> this patch series for over a year -- it's not high priority --
>> this
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 08:20:22PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Jim Meyering writes:
>
> >> I honestly don't see the point of this whitespace change unless done
> >> across all ChangeLogs, not just a few that you happen to touch.
> >
> > As I said, it's gone, now, from my patch.
> > If no one obje
I'm OK with the libiberty parts.
Jim Meyering writes:
>> I honestly don't see the point of this whitespace change unless done
>> across all ChangeLogs, not just a few that you happen to touch.
>
> As I said, it's gone, now, from my patch.
> If no one objects, I'll normalize all ChangeLog files.
No objection per se, although it'
Rainer Orth wrote:
> Jim Meyering writes:
>>> the change at hand. And please don't change the alignment of entries
>>> with multiple email addresses.
>>
>> Changing 8-spaces to a TAB does not affect alignment when you're
>> looking at the ChangeLog file itself with standard tab setting.
>>
>> Per
Jim Meyering writes:
>> the change at hand. And please don't change the alignment of entries
>> with multiple email addresses.
>
> Changing 8-spaces to a TAB does not affect alignment when you're
> looking at the ChangeLog file itself with standard tab setting.
>
> Perhaps you looked at a hunk l
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> ...
>> We definitely don't want to make local changes to zlib for this sort of
>> issue, though importing a new upstream version of zlib (making sure the
>> local configure code still works) should be fine for 4.7.
>
> Thanks again for the feedback.
>
Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 22:47 Mon 07 Mar , Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html says Classpath changes should
>> > > go
>> > > via Classpath upstream, not directly into GCC. I don't know if tha
Rainer Orth wrote:
> Jim Meyering writes:
>> I've taken the liberty of letting my editor remove trailing
>> blanks in ChangeLog files. I hope that's ok. Also in ChangeLogs,
>> I converted some leading 8-space (and 7-space) sequences to single TABs.
>
> Please move this to a separate patch: this
On 22:47 Mon 07 Mar , Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html says Classpath changes should
> > > go
> > > via Classpath upstream, not directly into GCC. I don't know if that's
> > > still accurate.
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/05/11 07:05, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Someone asked me about this yesterday, and since I've been carrying
> this patch series for over a year -- it's not high priority --
> this seems like a good time finally to post it.
>
> I've been r
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:28:37AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Rainer Orth writes:
>
> >> I found no ChangeLog for libgo and no other libgo-related entries.
> >> I suspect that means I should omit this change because it belongs upstream.
> >
> > Indeed, cf. libgo/README*. I've Cc'ed Ian who
Rainer Orth writes:
>> I found no ChangeLog for libgo and no other libgo-related entries.
>> I suspect that means I should omit this change because it belongs upstream.
>
> Indeed, cf. libgo/README*. I've Cc'ed Ian who maintains this part of
> GCC.
Yes, libgo is upstream but in any case I'd pre
Jim Meyering writes:
> I've taken the liberty of letting my editor remove trailing
> blanks in ChangeLog files. I hope that's ok. Also in ChangeLogs,
> I converted some leading 8-space (and 7-space) sequences to single TABs.
Please move this to a separate patch: this is completely unrelated to
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Thank you for the prompt feedback.
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h b/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h
>> index 7a7e840..8993fc7 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h
>> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h
>> @@ -67,
On 03/05/2011 03:05 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/del_opnt.cc
> b/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/del_opnt.cc
> index 75051d5..29eab10 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/del_opnt.cc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/del_opnt.cc
> @@ -31,6 +31,5 @@ extern "C" void free (void
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html says Classpath changes should go
> > via Classpath upstream, not directly into GCC. I don't know if that's
> > still accurate.
> >
>
> That's still true. This seems to be the first message I've rec
On 19:16 Sat 05 Mar , Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h b/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h
> > index 7a7e840..8993fc7 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h
> > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h
> > @@ -67,8 +67
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Jim Meyering wrote:
> diff --git a/intl/bindtextdom.c b/intl/bindtextdom.c
> index 6faac57..ba3cc9a 100644
Sorry, missed these in the first pass; intl/ is another case where we
wouldn't want to patch this locally. An import of updated libintl from
newer upstream gettext wou
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Jim Meyering wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h b/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h
> index 7a7e840..8993fc7 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h
> @@ -67,8 +67,7 @@ _mm_malloc (size_t size, size_t align)
> static __inline
36 matches
Mail list logo
