On Jul 14, 2021, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Can you put the above (and maybe your patch) into a PR so it doesn't
> get lost?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101454
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hackerhttps://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 7:10 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jul 13, 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > Hmm, elsewhere in this function we're not anticipating future removal but
> > instead use ->global_info_ready which IIRC is when the unit was
> > initially analyzed. So don't the other uses ha
On Jul 13, 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> Hmm, elsewhere in this function we're not anticipating future removal but
> instead use ->global_info_ready which IIRC is when the unit was
> initially analyzed. So don't the other uses have the same issue?
Possibly.
The call to debug_hooks->late_global
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:13 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
>
> If some IPA pass replaces the only reference to a constant non-public
> non-automatic variable with its initializer, namely the address of
> another such variable, the former becomes unreferenced and it's
> discarded by symbol_table::rem
