On 06/12/2012 01:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 06/12/2012 11:53 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06/05/2012 05:19 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hi,
what is the blocking point for the integration of these patches?
Ping.
GCC uses a *-*-*eabi patterns to destinguish EABI toolchains from other A
On 06/12/2012 11:53 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06/05/2012 05:19 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hi,
what is the blocking point for the integration of these patches?
Ping.
GCC uses a *-*-*eabi patterns to destinguish EABI toolchains from other
ABIs. Your endeavour contradicts the spirit beh
On 06/05/2012 05:19 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hi,
what is the blocking point for the integration of these patches?
Ping.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail :
On 05/14/2012 08:51 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Joel Sherrill wrote:
There is a long explanation in the PR but the short
version is that although we fully intended to switch
the arm-rtems target from ELF to EABI we never
intended the target name "arm-*-rtemseabi*" to
become
Hi,
what is the blocking point for the integration of these patches?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key a
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> There is a long explanation in the PR but the short
> version is that although we fully intended to switch
> the arm-rtems target from ELF to EABI we never
> intended the target name "arm-*-rtemseabi*" to
> become the preferred arm RTEMS target name.
> W
