Hello, Iain,
Sorry about the late response.
On Mar 11, 2021, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Mar 10, 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>>> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c: Enable __float128.
>>
>> I've been reminded that this is not enough for the scan-assembler tests
>>
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Mar 11, 2021, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Mar 10, 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
* gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c: Enable __float128.
I've been reminded that this is not enough for the scan-assembler tests
to pass, at least in our configurat
On Mar 11, 2021, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Mar 10, 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>>> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c: Enable __float128.
>>
>> I've been reminded that this is not enough for the scan-assembler tests
>> to pass, at least in our configurations. Nea
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Mar 10, 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
* gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c: Enable __float128.
I've been reminded that this is not enough for the scan-assembler tests
to pass, at least in our configurations. Nearly all of the asm
expectations are unmet. I'm yet to
On Mar 10, 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c: Enable __float128.
I've been reminded that this is not enough for the scan-assembler tests
to pass, at least in our configurations. Nearly all of the asm
expectations are unmet. I'm yet to identify the root ca
