> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 30 2019, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >>
> >> Looking at PR 92278, I think I found the real problem. In
> >> ipa_read_edge_info, you added code to throw away jump functions of edges
> >> that do not pass possibly_call_in_translation_unit_p() test. But that
> >> predicate incorrectl
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30 2019, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>> Looking at PR 92278, I think I found the real problem. In
>> ipa_read_edge_info, you added code to throw away jump functions of edges
>> that do not pass possibly_call_in_translation_unit_p() test. But that
>> predicate incorrectly - or at least
Hi again, now also CCing the mailing list,
On Wed, Oct 30 2019, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 30 2019, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > this patch fixes another place we may have missing argument summary.
>> > Here the situation is that the call site being inlined has no jump
>> >
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:06 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 30 2019, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > this patch fixes another place we may have missing argument summary.
> > Here the situation is that the call site being inlined has no jump
> > functions while function which is bei
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30 2019, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this patch fixes another place we may have missing argument summary.
> Here the situation is that the call site being inlined has no jump
> functions while function which is being inlines has another call with
> jump function. This can validly h
