On 07/04/2017 04:19 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this is another bug I noticed while looking into Itanium rgression.
> There is no profile attached to recovery blocks in scheduler.
> I made them very unlikely, but I wonder if we can do better? After all
> we probably know the probability of path
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > this is another bug I noticed while looking into Itanium rgression.
> > There is no profile attached to recovery blocks in scheduler.
> > I made them very unlikely, but I wonder if we can do better? After all
> > we probably know the probabili
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this is another bug I noticed while looking into Itanium rgression.
> There is no profile attached to recovery blocks in scheduler.
> I made them very unlikely, but I wonder if we can do better? After all
> we probably know the probability of path tha
