Re: Support for V2 plugin API

2011-10-06 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > >> This caused: > >> > >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50601 > > Hi, > > do you use linker with V2 API? > > > > No. Hi, the problem is that partitioning algorithm forgets about the aliase and don't put it into any partition. I

Re: Support for V2 plugin API

2011-10-03 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> This caused: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50601 > Hi, > do you use linker with V2 API? > No. -- H.J.

Re: Support for V2 plugin API

2011-10-03 Thread Jan Hubicka
> This caused: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50601 Hi, do you use linker with V2 API? Honza > > -- > H.J.

Re: Support for V2 plugin API

2011-10-03 Thread H.J. Lu
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hi, > this patch adds support for V2 plugin API (thanks, Cary) that adds > LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY_EXP. > The reoslution is like LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY but the symbol is exported > out of DSO.  It is up to the compiler to optimize it out

Re: Support for V2 plugin API

2011-09-28 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hi, > this patch adds support for V2 plugin API (thanks, Cary) that adds > LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY_EXP. > The reoslution is like LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY but the symbol is exported > out of DSO. It is up to the compiler to optimize it out or keep it