Then you don't need to waste time on reduce the case from SPEC.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Date: 2023-09-12 17:36
To: Robin Dapp; gcc-patches
CC: Robin Dapp; kito.cheng; Kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V4] RISC-V: Support Dynamic LMUL Cost model
Th
This is first version of dynamic LMUL.
I didn't test it with full GCC testsuite.
My plan is to first pass all GCC testsuite (including vect.exp) with default
LMUL = M1.
Then enable dynamic LMUL to test it.
Maybe we could tolerate this ICE issue for now. Then we can test it with full
GCC testsui
Is calculix big ?
Could you give me the testcase to reproduce it?
For + gcc_assert (biggest_size >= mode_size);
I currently don't have an idea to fix it.
But for + mode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (lhs));
I think I can fix it.
if (!gimple_store_p (stmt))
{
tree l
Thanks Robin.
I have tried your codes. It works fine and tests passes.
Does your code O(nlogn) complexity ?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2023-09-12 16:19
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] RISC-V: Support Dyn
