Hi!
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 07:46:53PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Please make such changes if you agree. Either way, okay for trunk.
Oh, and okay for backport to 9 next week :-)
Segher
Hi Carl,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 04:19:18PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> > Yes, but only for this fprnd vs. 2.06 (vsx) situation. Like we
> > already
> > have:
> >
> > if (TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE && !TARGET_VSX)
> > {
> > if (rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE)
> > e
Segher:
>
> Yes, but only for this fprnd vs. 2.06 (vsx) situation. Like we
> already
> have:
>
> if (TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE && !TARGET_VSX)
> {
> if (rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE)
> error ("%qs requires %qs", "-mdirect-move", "-mvsx");
> rs6000_isa_f
Hi Carl,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:57:06AM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> > From the GCC manual:
> >
> > -mmfcrfp4 2.01
> > -mpopcntb p5 2.02
> > -mfprndp5+ 2.04 ("info gcc" says 2.03, that's wrong? But the
> > ISA
> > says this is 2.02 even? Now what!)
> >
Segher:
>
> From the GCC manual:
>
> -mmfcrfp4 2.01
> -mpopcntb p5 2.02
> -mfprndp5+ 2.04 ("info gcc" says 2.03, that's wrong? But the
> ISA
> says this is 2.02 even? Now what!)
> -mcmpb p6 2.05
> -mpopcntd p7 2.06
>
> (and there are more,
