Re: RFC: PATCH to pointer_int_sum vs. pointer-arith-10.c

2015-10-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 10/21/2015 12:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: >>> >>> I made this change on the delayed folding branch and then noticed that it >>> broke pointer-arith-10.c, which you added to the

Re: RFC: PATCH to pointer_int_sum vs. pointer-arith-10.c

2015-10-23 Thread Jason Merrill
On 10/21/2015 12:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: I made this change on the delayed folding branch and then noticed that it broke pointer-arith-10.c, which you added to the testsuite. The patch changes the -original dump from return (char *

Re: RFC: PATCH to pointer_int_sum vs. pointer-arith-10.c

2015-10-21 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: > I made this change on the delayed folding branch and then noticed that it > broke pointer-arith-10.c, which you added to the testsuite. The patch > changes the -original dump from > > return (char *) ((sizetype) p + (sizetype) i); > > to >