On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:25:51AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Do not go down the route of -Wunreachable-code again please.
Yeah, I don't think we want -Wunused-but-set* as a late warning,
it is intentionally in the FE where is the only place where the false
positive ratio of the warning can st
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/18/2017 12:55 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The attached patch tries to fix PR80806 by warning when a variable is
> > set using memset (and friends) but not used. I chose to warn in dse
> > pass since dse would detect if the variable passed
On 06/29/2017 12:05 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/29/2017 11:57 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/23/2017 09:58 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 05/18/2017 12:55 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch tries to fix PR80806 by warning when a variable is
set using memset (and friends) but not used.
On 05/18/2017 12:55 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> The attached patch tries to fix PR80806 by warning when a variable is
> set using memset (and friends) but not used. I chose to warn in dse
> pass since dse would detect if the variable passed as 1st argument is
> a dead store. Does this ap
On 06/29/2017 11:57 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/23/2017 09:58 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> On 05/18/2017 12:55 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> The attached patch tries to fix PR80806 by warning when a variable is
>>> set using memset (and friends) but not used. I chose to warn in dse
>>> p
On 05/23/2017 09:58 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 05/18/2017 12:55 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The attached patch tries to fix PR80806 by warning when a variable is
>> set using memset (and friends) but not used. I chose to warn in dse
>> pass since dse would detect if the variable pass
I attach an updated patch that actually bootstraps and (with
one minor exception) passes regression tests. It's a C front
end-only proof of concept for now. The complete patch will
include attributes read-only and read-write and support C++
of course. I think the optimization bits can be done i
On 05/18/2017 12:55 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch tries to fix PR80806 by warning when a variable is
set using memset (and friends) but not used. I chose to warn in dse
pass since dse would detect if the variable passed as 1st argument is
a dead store. Does this approach l
On 22 May 2017 at 10:03, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/18/2017 12:55 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The attached patch tries to fix PR80806 by warning when a variable is
>> set using memset (and friends) but not used. I chose to warn in dse
>> pass since dse would detect if the variable passed
On 05/18/2017 12:55 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> The attached patch tries to fix PR80806 by warning when a variable is
> set using memset (and friends) but not used. I chose to warn in dse
> pass since dse would detect if the variable passed as 1st argument is
> a dead store. Does this ap
10 matches
Mail list logo
