On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> The wide-int version of int_const_binop_1 has:
>
> static tree
> int_const_binop_1 (enum tree_code code, const_tree arg1, const_tree parg2,
>int overflowable)
> {
> [...]
> tree type = TREE_TYPE (arg1);
> [...]
>
On May 10, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> The new conversion can't be right because it loses overflow information.
> The question then is whether this function should be prepared to handle
> mismatched arguments (as the pre-wide-int version effectively did, since
> it did everythin
