Dimitrios Apostolou writes:
> @@ -3849,6 +3850,32 @@ sprint_ul_rev (char *s, unsigned long va
>return i;
> }
>
> +/* Write a signed HOST_WIDE_INT as decimal to a file, fast. */
> +
> +void
> +fprint_w (FILE *f, HOST_WIDE_INT value)
> +{
> + /* python says: len(str(2**64)) == 20 */
> + ch
On Jul 9, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> Since output_addr_const() shows pretty hot in the compiler, I reinstated the
> fprint_w() call in place of fprintf().
My review bits... First there is no guarantee that HOST_WIDE_INT_BITSIZE is 64
or less, so [20] is unsafe longer term.
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> Since output_addr_const() shows pretty hot in the compiler, I reinstated the
> fprint_w() call in place of fprintf().
>
> This patch relies on two things: 2's complement representation for negative
> int and that HOST_WIDE_INT is at least as large ty
