Re: One more patch for PR93564

2020-03-02 Thread Jeff Law
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 08:40 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 08:17 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 15:37 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 17:39, Vladimir Makarov > > > wrote: > > > > The following patch is dealing with arm failures after s

Re: One more patch for PR93564

2020-03-02 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2020-03-02 10:17 a.m., Jeff Law wrote: On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 15:37 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 17:39, Vladimir Makarov wrote: The following patch is dealing with arm failures after submitting original patch for PR93564. Changing heuristics in the original

Re: One more patch for PR93564

2020-03-02 Thread Jeff Law
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 08:17 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 15:37 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 17:39, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > > > The following patch is dealing with arm failures after submitting > > > original patch for PR93564. > > > > > >Chang

Re: One more patch for PR93564

2020-03-02 Thread Jeff Law
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 15:37 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 17:39, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > > The following patch is dealing with arm failures after submitting > > original patch for PR93564. > > > >Changing heuristics in the original patch resulted in different orde

Re: One more patch for PR93564

2020-03-02 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 17:39, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > > The following patch is dealing with arm failures after submitting > original patch for PR93564. > >Changing heuristics in the original patch resulted in different order > of allocation and creating gaps in hard reg file which were not