On 08/25/2011 06:21 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 07/18/11 18:47, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
But I guess comb-vector is popular for a reason. We could tolerate slow
compression time because it is done once but worse compression and
slower access would have a really bad impact on the compiler time.
On 07/18/11 18:47, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> But I guess comb-vector is popular for a reason. We could tolerate slow
> compression time because it is done once but worse compression and
> slower access would have a really bad impact on the compiler time.
With some fixes that I need to make to the
On 07/18/2011 11:27 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 07/18/11 17:09, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 07/11/2011 05:09 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
I came up with the notion of adding a new transition to the NDFA, one
which collapses a nondeterministic state (which is composed of multiple
possible determinist
On 07/18/11 17:09, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 07/11/2011 05:09 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> I came up with the notion of adding a new transition to the NDFA, one
>> which collapses a nondeterministic state (which is composed of multiple
>> possible deterministic ones) to just one of its component
On 07/11/2011 05:09 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On C6X, we want to use the "ndfa" option to give the scheduler maximum
freedom when assigning units to instructions. After scheduling is
complete, we process the insns again in c6x_reorg, looking at each cycle
and assigning a unit specifier to each ins
