On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Well, a wrong-code bug plus a very obvious fix certainly qualifies.
>
> Fine with me, onto which branch(es) do you want me to put it?
Where you have tested it already, no need to spend extra cycles.
Richard.
> --
> Eric Botcazou
> Well, a wrong-code bug plus a very obvious fix certainly qualifies.
Fine with me, onto which branch(es) do you want me to put it?
--
Eric Botcazou
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I suppose you also install on branches?
>
> No plan to do so since this isn't a regression, unless you insist. :-)
Well, a wrong-code bug plus a very obvious fix certainly qualifies.
Richard.
> --
> Eric Botcazou
> I suppose you also install on branches?
No plan to do so since this isn't a regression, unless you insist. :-)
--
Eric Botcazou
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> This is an old bug in div_and_round_double for ROUND_DIV_EXPR: when the code
> detects that it needs to adjust the quotient, it needs to decide whether it
> increases or decreases it by 1. This only depends on the expected sign of the
> quo
