Re: Fix increase_alignment

2015-04-08 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 2 April 2015 at 01:20, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> >> Your follow-up patch 88ada5e935d58223ae2d9ce6d0c1c71c372680a8 a.k.a r221269 >> added this to emit_local(): >> >> static bool >> -emit_local (tree decl ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, >> +emit_local (tree decl, >> const char *name ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,

Re: Fix increase_alignment

2015-04-01 Thread Jan Hubicka
> > Your follow-up patch 88ada5e935d58223ae2d9ce6d0c1c71c372680a8 a.k.a r221269 > added this to emit_local(): > > static bool > -emit_local (tree decl ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, > +emit_local (tree decl, > const char *name ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, > unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT size ATTRIBUTE_

Re: Fix increase_alignment

2015-04-01 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 9 March 2015 at 00:37, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> >> I unforutnately spot another problem. With presence of section anchors we >> can not increase alignment of symbol that was already placed into the >> section. >> I think this is reason why we still have pass_increase_alignments that runs >> only

Re: Fix increase_alignment

2015-03-08 Thread Jan Hubicka
> > I unforutnately spot another problem. With presence of section anchors we > can not increase alignment of symbol that was already placed into the section. > I think this is reason why we still have pass_increase_alignments that runs > only on target with anchors. > > I added the following che