Hi,
This patch is still pending a full review.
Best regards,
- Marcel
> On 30 Jun 2016, at 12:09 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> On 06/29/2016 08:43 AM, Marcel Böhme wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> These test cases are generated by fuzzing which produces a lot of
>> nonsensical input data.
>> I think,
On 06/29/2016 08:43 AM, Marcel Böhme wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> These test cases are generated by fuzzing which produces a lot of nonsensical
> input data.
> I think, "Garbage In, Garbage Out" is quite applicable here.
> With the patch at least it doesn’t crash and fixes the vulnerability.
Note tha
Hi Jason,
These test cases are generated by fuzzing which produces a lot of nonsensical
input data.
I think, "Garbage In, Garbage Out" is quite applicable here.
With the patch at least it doesn’t crash and fixes the vulnerability.
Best regards,
- Marcel
> On 26 May 2016, at 10:05 PM, Jason Mer
It seems like in cases of malformed input we should return the input
again rather than produce garbage like "K". Maybe catch this sort of situation in
d_lookup_template_parameter?
Jason
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Marcel Böhme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This fixes several stack overflows due to inf
Hi,
This patch is pending a careful review.
Best regards,
- Marcel
> On 2 May 2016, at 11:21 PM, Marcel Böhme wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This fixes several stack overflows due to infinite recursion in d_print_comp
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909).
>
> The method d_print_comp i
