On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:26:29PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > TARGET_MACHO is always defined (either 0 or 1) so using #ifndef to test
> > for !TARGET_MACHO is incorrect. Introduced here:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00623.html
>
On 18 Jan 2012, at 12:26, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
TARGET_MACHO is always defined (either 0 or 1) so using #ifndef to
test
for !TARGET_MACHO is incorrect. Introduced here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00623.html
The i386 case has been
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> TARGET_MACHO is always defined (either 0 or 1) so using #ifndef to test
> for !TARGET_MACHO is incorrect. Introduced here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00623.html
>
> The i386 case has been tested on i386-freebsd. The compiler now emit