Hi,
On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> OK.
> Don't you need to adjust existing unroll and jam testcases?
Ahem... that's at least what the regression testing told me as well :)
Fixed in what I checked in (the only testcase we had was the one I added
yesterday)
Ciao,
Michael.
On December 8, 2017 5:44:31 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Matz wrote:
>Hi,
>
>the predicate for feasiblity of unroll-and-jam was a bit nonsensical.
>Properly check for non-head-controlled loops, and also check all BBs of
>
>the outer loop for any instructions that would inhibit fusion (before
>we
>neve
