On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:58:07AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> Btw. do we want such patch to be backported?
No.
Jakub
On 02/16/2018 10:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:53:58AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'm sending patch that does what Jakub suggested.
>> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>> I consider the previous email as approval and
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:53:58AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm sending patch that does what Jakub suggested.
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
> I consider the previous email as approval and I'm going to install the patch.
Ok, thanks.
> >Fr
Hi.
I'm sending patch that does what Jakub suggested.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
I consider the previous email as approval and I'm going to install the patch.
Thanks,
Martin
>From b306ad522ed0f8a010647d0eb1d9c36b102e92c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fro
On 02/13/2018 04:22 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 13/02/2018 14:35, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:21:55PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:15:36PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The issue is that the ASAN_CHECK doesn't exist at early DSE time, and
thus causes
On 13/02/2018 14:35, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:21:55PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:15:36PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> The issue is that the ASAN_CHECK doesn't exist at early DSE time, and
>>> thus causes the store to disappear.
>>
>> If it
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:21:55PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:15:36PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 13/02/2018 10:32, Martin Liška wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > It caused PR84340, I'm suggesting following fix:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:15:36PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 13/02/2018 10:32, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > It caused PR84340, I'm suggesting following fix:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84340#c3
>
> I don't think EAF_DIRECT is the issue. You could think of AS
On 13/02/2018 10:32, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> It caused PR84340, I'm suggesting following fix:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84340#c3
I don't think EAF_DIRECT is the issue. You could think of ASAN_MARK as
writing a global variable, which it can do because it's not const.