On 30/03/16 14:36, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> >You are only changing one place in this file.
>
>You are right. I am attaching the updated patch which I am re-testing now.
> >
> >The vectorizer already checks this (albeit indirectly):
> >
> > HOST_WID
On March 30, 2016 2:36:14 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Biener
wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
>> >
>> > You are only changing one place in this file.
>>
>> You are right. I am attaching the updated patch which I am re-testing
>now.
>> >
>> > The vectorizer already checks this (albei
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > - /* If access is not executed on every iteration, we must ensure that
>> > overlow may
>> > - not make the access valid later. */
>> > + /* If access is not executed on every iteration, we must ensure that
>> > overlow
>> > + m
> > - /* If access is not executed on every iteration, we must ensure that
> > overlow may
> > - not make the access valid later. */
> > + /* If access is not executed on every iteration, we must ensure that
> > overlow
> > + may not make the access valid later. */
> >if (!dominat
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> while looking into sudoku solving benchark, I noticed that we incorrectly
> estimate loop to iterate 10 times just because the array it traverses is of
> dimension 10. This of course is just upper bound and not realistic bound.
> Realist
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > You are only changing one place in this file.
>
> You are right. I am attaching the updated patch which I am re-testing now.
> >
> > The vectorizer already checks this (albeit indirectly):
> >
> > HOST_WIDE_INT max_niter
> > = max_stmt_exec
>
> You are only changing one place in this file.
You are right. I am attaching the updated patch which I am re-testing now.
>
> The vectorizer already checks this (albeit indirectly):
>
> HOST_WIDE_INT max_niter
> = max_stmt_executions_int (LOOP_VINFO_LOOP (loop_vinfo));
> if ((LOOP_VI
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> while looking into sudoku solving benchark, I noticed that we incorrectly
> estimate loop to iterate 10 times just because the array it traverses is of
> dimension 10. This of course is just upper bound and not realistic bound.
> Realistically those
