Re: COBOL: Implementation of STOP RUN / GOBACK

Am 20.03.2025 um 21:50 schrieb James K. Lowden: On Mar 13, 2025, at 8:04 AM, Simon Sobisch wrote: exit() allows us to "pass to the operating system" directly; but it doesn't directly say "success" or "fail". Obviously the statements STOP RUN WITH NORMAL STATUS 41 and STOP RUN ERROR

Re: COBOL: Implementation of STOP RUN / GOBACK

On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 11:50:19 +0100 "Jose E. Marchesi" wrote: > > > Am 20.03.2025 um 21:50 schrieb James K. Lowden: > >> On Mar 13, 2025, at 8:04 AM, Simon Sobisch > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> exit() allows us to "pass to the operating system" directly; but > >>> it doesn't directly say "success" or

Re: COBOL: Implementation of STOP RUN / GOBACK

> Am 20.03.2025 um 21:50 schrieb James K. Lowden: >> On Mar 13, 2025, at 8:04 AM, Simon Sobisch wrote: >>> >>> exit() allows us to "pass to the operating system" directly; but it doesn't >>> directly say "success" or "fail". >>> >>> >>> Obviously the statements >>>STOP RUN WITH NORMAL STATU

Re: COBOL: Implementation of STOP RUN / GOBACK

Am 21.03.2025 um 11:50 schrieb Jose E. Marchesi: Am 20.03.2025 um 21:50 schrieb James K. Lowden: On Mar 13, 2025, at 8:04 AM, Simon Sobisch wrote: exit() allows us to "pass to the operating system" directly; but it doesn't directly say "success" or "fail". Obviously the statements

Re: COBOL: Implementation of STOP RUN / GOBACK [was: [PATCH][v3] Simple cobol.dg testsuite]

On Mar 13, 2025, at 8:04 AM, Simon Sobisch wrote: > > exit() allows us to "pass to the operating system" directly; but it doesn't > directly say "success" or "fail". > > > Obviously the statements > STOP RUN WITH NORMAL STATUS 41 > and > STOP RUN ERROR 41 > > Should have a different resul