On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:48 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 01:43:12PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:49 AM Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:53:16AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 2/26/19 5:13 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 01:43:12PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:49 AM Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:53:16AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 2/26/19 5:13 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > Here we ICE because the unscoped enum's context is a FUNC
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:49 AM Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:53:16AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 2/26/19 5:13 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > Here we ICE because the unscoped enum's context is a FUNCTION_DECL, which
> > > push_using_decl can't handle.
> > >
> > > http:/
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:53:16AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 2/26/19 5:13 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Here we ICE because the unscoped enum's context is a FUNCTION_DECL, which
> > push_using_decl can't handle.
> >
> > http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_active.html#1742
> > say
On 2/26/19 5:13 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Here we ICE because the unscoped enum's context is a FUNCTION_DECL, which
push_using_decl can't handle.
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_active.html#1742
says this is well-formed (but the scoped enum case is ill-formed).
Nevertheless, the D
