On 03/03/2016 05:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/25/2016 09:08 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
We don't bother evaluating a store to an empty class member, and we
shouldn't complain about accesses either.
This needs to use really_empty_class, since that's what
expand_aggr_init_1 uses.
And even ca
On 02/25/2016 09:08 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
We don't bother evaluating a store to an empty class member, and we
shouldn't complain about accesses either.
This needs to use really_empty_class, since that's what
expand_aggr_init_1 uses.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 5.
c
