Re: Build gcc/ with -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti

2011-11-03 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > Thus, ok if it passes some testing. > > And with PR bootstrap/50857 in the ChangeLog for extra brownie points. r180833. Ciao, Michael.

Re: Build gcc/ with -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti

2011-11-03 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Thus, ok if it passes some testing. And with PR bootstrap/50857 in the ChangeLog for extra brownie points. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: Build gcc/ with -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti

2011-11-03 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 11/03/2011 03:16 PM, Michael Matz wrote: >> >  >  There is a bug about not using -fexceptions (50857). >>> >>> > >>> >  Then let's fix it, as you said there "We fail to pass -fno-exceptions >>> >  -fno-rtti to g++ for stage2 and stage3

Re: Build gcc/ with -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti

2011-11-03 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 11/03/2011 03:16 PM, Michael Matz wrote: > > There is a bug about not using -fexceptions (50857). > > Then let's fix it, as you said there "We fail to pass -fno-exceptions > -fno-rtti to g++ for stage2 and stage3 building the host binaries. > That leads to increased compile-time and po