On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Sandiford writes:
>> "Bin.Cheng" writes:
>>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> vect_find_same_alignment_drs uses the ddr depende
Richard Sandiford writes:
> "Bin.Cheng" writes:
>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
vect_find_same_alignment_drs uses the ddr dependence distance
to tell whether two references have the same alig
"Bin.Cheng" writes:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> vect_find_same_alignment_drs uses the ddr dependence distance
>>> to tell whether two references have the same alignment. Although
>>> that's safe wi
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> vect_find_same_alignment_drs uses the ddr dependence distance
>> to tell whether two references have the same alignment. Although
>> that's safe with the current code, there's n
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> vect_find_same_alignment_drs uses the ddr dependence distance
> to tell whether two references have the same alignment. Although
> that's safe with the current code, there's no particular reason
> why a dependence distance of 0 should mea