On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:34:07PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Mike Stump wrote:
>
> > date on it. If there was no major release with c17, I would ditch the
> > c17 spelling and just change it to c18 now. :-) I know, kinda sucks,
>
> There is no evidence yet of anyone u
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Mike Stump wrote:
> date on it. If there was no major release with c17, I would ditch the
> c17 spelling and just change it to c18 now. :-) I know, kinda sucks,
There is no evidence yet of anyone using the C18 name. So far, it's
consistently being referred to as C17 in
On Nov 16, 2017, at 2:24 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> ISO C17 won't go to ballot until December, meaning publication of the
> standard won't be until 2018, leaving ambiguity as to whether people
> will end up referring to the standard as C17, as it's currently known
> and which corresponds to the
