On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 1:03 AM gengqi-linux
wrote:
> Thanks for your replies.
>
I would suggest filing a bug report, and adding useful info from this
thread to the bug report. Then we can track it.
Jim
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Note that only in the -mfoo6= case are the duplicate options removed from
> the command line. So pruning options requires that you have both
> RejectNegative and Negative pointing at yourself, which is not what the
> documentation says.
Thanks for the exa
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 1:11 PM Joseph Myers
wrote:
> Could you please explain the bug at the *user-visible* level? That is,
> the particular options passed to the compiler, how those options behave,
> and how you think they should behave instead.
I added this to the riscv.opt file to create s
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021, gengqi-linux via Gcc-patches wrote:
> I have been fixing a bug. It involved the Negative property of options,
> and I have some confusion about it.
Could you please explain the bug at the *user-visible* level? That is,
the particular options passed to the compiler, how tho
