Now committed, taking Andrew's comments into account:
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html#amdgcn
Tobias
-
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634
München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas
Heurung, Frank Thü
On 02/02/2022 15:39, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 09.08.21 15:55, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Now that the GCN/OpenACC patches for this have been committed today,
I think it makes sense to add it to the documentation.
(I was told that some follow-up items are still pending, but as
the feature does work ...)
On 09.08.21 15:55, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Now that the GCN/OpenACC patches for this have been committed today,
I think it makes sense to add it to the documentation.
(I was told that some follow-up items are still pending, but as
the feature does work ...)
I think the follow-up patches have now b
Hi!
On 2021-08-16T10:34:34+0200, "Stubbs, Andrew" wrote:
>> In other words: For gangs > #CUs or >1 gang per CU, the following patch
>> is needed:
>>[OG11] https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4dcd1e1f4e6b451aac44f919b8eb3ac49292b308
>>[email] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/550102.h
> In other words: For gangs > #CUs or >1 gang per CU, the following patch
> is needed:
>[OG11] https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4dcd1e1f4e6b451aac44f919b8eb3ac49292b308
>[email] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/550102.html
> "not suitable for mainline until the multiple-worke
Hi all,
On 09.08.21 20:53, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
(Is "CU" a sufficiently established term, or might it make sense
to spell it out?)
I don't know – but we could use "per compute unit (CU)".
On 09.08.21 16:27, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On 2021-08-09T15:55:07+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
+++ b/htd
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Comments and/or suggestions?
Looks good from my perspective, with the feedback that Thomas
provided.
(Is "CU" a sufficiently established term, or might it make sense
to spell it out?)
Thanks,
Gerald
Hi!
On 2021-08-09T15:55:07+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Now that the GCN/OpenACC patches for this have been committed today,
> I think it makes sense to add it to the documentation.
Thanks for thinking of this.
> (I was told that some follow-up items are still pending, but as
> the feature does
